Maya Kowalski’s Story: do no harm
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Johns Hopkins Hospital was ordered to pay $261 million to the Kowalski family following a lawsuit revealing ethical and systemic failures in medical care. The story follows Maya, diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Ketamine treatment turns into tragedy when misunderstandings lead to false accusations against the mother. Maya is separated from her parents, facing devastating consequences.
This case highlights medical gaslighting. Lack of communication, institutional accountability, poor patient-physician relationships and non-maleficence contributed to this tragedy and raises ethical questions about the use of experimental treatments. The story underscores the importance of a doctor-patient relationship based on trust and empathy, as well as the need for ongoing ethical training for health professionals. Bioethics must be fundamental in medical care to avoid tragedies such as that of the Kowalski family.
Downloads
PLUMX Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Medicina y Ética is distributed under a Creative Commons License Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
The author keeps the property rights with no restriction whatsoever and guarantees the magazine the right to be the first publication of the work. The author is free to deposit the published version in any other medium, such as an institutional archive or on his own website.
References
McHardy M. ‘Cuiden a Maya’: El Hospital Johns Hopkins indemnizará con $261 millones a la familia de Maya Kowalski. Independent [Internet]. 2023. Disponible en: https://www.independentespanol.com/noticias/eeuu/maya-kowalski-veredicto-juicio-netflix-documental-b2448000.html
Roosevelt H. Take Care of Maya [Internet]. Netflix; 2023. Disponible en: https://www.netflix.com/search?q=maya&jbv=81349305
Abu-Arafeh H, Abu-Arafeh I. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in Children: A Systematic Review of Clinical features and movement Disorders. Pain management [Internet]. 2017; 7(2):133-40. https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt-2016-0036
Martín F, de Andrés Ares J. (2019). Síndrome de dolor regional complejo: claves diagnósticas para el médico no especialista. Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes, 30(6):446-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2019.10.006
Fernández-Cuadros, M, Martín-Martín L, Albaladejo-Florín M, Pérez-Moro O, Goizueta-San-Martín G. Sensibilidad de la respuesta simpática cutánea y de la gammagrafía en el diagnóstico del síndrome dolor regional complejo. Rehabilitación, 58(1):100807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rh.2023.100807
Harden RN, Bruehl S, Pérez R, Birklein F, Marinus J, Maihöfner C. Validation of proposed diagnostic criteria (the “Budapest Criteria”) for complex regional pain syndrome. Pain [Internet]. 2010; 150(2):268-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.030
Hernández-Porras BC, Plancarte-Sánchez R, Alarcón-Barrios S, Sámano-García M. Síndrome doloroso regional Complejo: revisión. Cirugía y Cirujanos [Internet]. 2017; 85(4):366-74. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.circir.2016.11.004
Bovaira-Forner, MT, García-Vitoria, C, Calvo-Laffarga, AA, Desé-Alonso, J, Tortosa-Soriano, G, Bayarri-García V, Alcaina-Vimbela O, Ortega-Romero A, Abejón-González D. Actualizaciones en el abordaje terapéutico en el síndrome de dolor regional complejo. Revista de la Sociedad Española del Dolor; 29(1):34-50. Epub, 2022. https://dx.doi.org/10.20986/resed.2022.3978/2022
Muñoz J, Becerra S. Analizamos el gaslighting y su impacto en la relación médico-paciente. Universidad Anáhuac México. Disponible en: https://www.anahuac.mx/mexico/noticias/analizamos-el-gaslighting-y-su-impacto-en-la-relacion-medico-paciente
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principios de Ética Biomédica. Oxford University Press; 2009.
Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making, the pinnacle of Patient-Centered care. The New England Journal of Medicine [Internet]. 2012; 366(9):780-1. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1109283
Pellegrino ED. The four principles and the Doctor-Patient relationship: the need for a better understanding [Internet]. Digital Georgetown. 2014. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/712079
Leape LL, Fromson JA. Problem Doctors: Is there a System-Level solution? Annals of Internal Medicine [Internet]. 2006; 144(2):107. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-2-200601170-00008
Machado C. Tendencias y principios en las corrientes bioéticas. Revista Colombiana de Bioética [Internet]. 2021; 16(2). https://doi.org/10.18270/rcb.v16i2.3077
Emanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA [Internet]. 2000; 283(20):2701. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.20.2701
Insua, J. (2018). Principialismo, bioética personalista y principios de acción en medicina y en servicios de salud. Persona y Bioética, [Internet]. 2018; 22(2):223-246. https://doi.org/10.5294/pebi.2018.22.2.3
Wilf-Miron R, Avni S, Valinsky L, Myers V, Ziv A, Peretz G, Luxenburg O, Saban M, Feder-Bubis P. Developing a National Set of Health Equity Indicators Using a Consensus Building Process. International journal of health policy and management, 2022; 11(8), 1522-1532. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.54
Feldman HA, Feldman JA, Miller CC, Walsh GL, Tyson JE. Informed Consent for Placebo-Controlled Trials: Do ethics and science conflict? Ethics & Human Research [Internet]. 2022; 44(5):42-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/eahr.500142
Moore v Regents of University of California. 51 Cal3d120; 271 CalRptr146; 793 P.2d 479; 1990.
Antonowicz JL. Families, Illness, and Disability: an Integrative Treatment model. Psychosomatics [Internet]. 1995; 36(3):310-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0033-3182(95)71672-3
Shaw EK, Howard J, West DRF, Crabtree BF, Nease DE, Tutt B. The role of the champion in primary care change efforts: from the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP). Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine [Internet]. 2012; 25(5):676-85. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.110281
De España, C. D. B. Informe del Comité de Bioética de España sobre los aspectos bioéticos de la priorización de recursos sanitarios en el contexto de la crisis del coronavirus. Persona y Bioética, 24(1), 77-89.
Wynia M. Ethics and Public Health Emergencies: Restrictions on liberty. American Journal of Bioethics [Internet]. 2007; 7(2):1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160701193559
Bernadá, M, Notejane, M. Planificación avanzada del cuidado y adecuación del esfuerzo terapéutico en pediatría. Fundamento y procedimiento. Archivos de Pediatría del Uruguay, 93(1), e603. Epub, 2022. http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1688-12492022000101603